Day 28 of 300: Base Run and the Bigger Picture

Two days ago I could barely function. Training readiness of 13, body trashed from the weekend. Yesterday I was still crawling back. Today, the plan was simple: get on the treadmill, run three honest kilometres, stay in Zone 3, don’t be a hero.

Three 1km intervals with a short cooldown. Heart rate climbed steadily from 126 bpm in the first kilometre to 143 by the third - classic cardiac drift during sustained effort, nothing unusual. Pace held steady around 7:15-7:30/km across the three splits. The second kilometre was actually the fastest at 7:11/km, which either means I got into a rhythm or briefly forgot I was supposed to be taking it easy.

The Garmin classed it as “Aerobic Base” with a training load of 67. No anaerobic contribution at all. Zero time in Zone 5. 81% of the session sat squarely in Zone 3. This is exactly the kind of boring, unglamorous work that compounds over weeks.

Heart Rate Zone Distribution

The overreaching problem

Here’s the thing though. My acute training load has hit 300, which is 2.1x my chronic load of 137. Garmin flags anything above 1.3x as risky and mine is firmly in “Very High” territory. Training readiness after the session dropped to 1 out of 100. One. The algorithm is basically screaming at me to sit down.

This isn’t because I’m training like an elite athlete. It’s because I went from doing very little to cramming in sessions while still carrying the fatigue from the weekend. The body doesn’t care about your intentions, only the load.

The next 24-48 hours need to be recovery. Water, sleep, light movement, nothing more.

The bigger picture: fitness age

I went down a rabbit hole with the Garmin data tonight and found the fitness age metric. Turns out my body thinks I’m 44.3 years old. I’m 43. Not catastrophic, but not great either.

The interesting part is the breakdown of what’s dragging it up and what could pull it down:

The achievable fitness age is 37.1. Seven years younger than where I am now. That’s not a fantasy number - it’s what Garmin calculates based on hitting realistic targets across those four components.

What else is in the data

While I was digging, I pulled out a few other metrics worth tracking over time:

None of these numbers are where I want them to be. But they’re all measurable, they’re all improvable, and now I know what levers to pull. The fitness age target of 37.1 gives the whole thing a concrete goal beyond just “do 300 sessions”.

Time to recover, then get back after it.


Feel free to subscribe to my newsletter, chat to me on mastodon or follow my blog in your favourite RSS reader.